Ubuntu is getting more annoying. Recently — I can’t remember exactly when — I’ve got a forced update which could not be interrupted. Very microsoftwindowish.
Now, it’s trying to make me upgrade the system to Ubuntu 20.04 LTS. The LTS bit almost got me, so maybe I’ve a little bit of peace.
But it told me it could take several hours. This made me think and check what’s in this 20.04, codenamed Focal fossa.
And I decided to stop the process and well, think to switch again away from this canonical monster — it’s nice and everything, but I can’t stand this microsoftish attitude and, more importantly, the very concept of updating regularly a system experimenting “new” features which smell a little (snaps what?).
Then, the only update I expect is about bug fixes. Moreover, we don’t need to ride the versions-wave of every software, unless we need that very brand new feature it hadn’t or that didn’t work so well in the current version.
I’m starting to believe that the package system and its dependency handling is broken, after all. Not as “technology” per se, but because of how packages were created — I remember vaguely to have stumbled upon a package which wanted its documentation, and so I couldn’t install it without that unnecessary burden. Maybe I don’t remember well and the dependency wasn’t with the doc package… anyway a dependecy oddness of sort happened and pissed me off.
Now, Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, … codenamed Focal Fossa…
Please, STOP referring to Ubuntu versions using their code name!
This is one thing which is very annoying. Shame on all authors who like to do so. With a version number, I know what comes first and what comes later. With a silly name, I can’t.
So, please, stop referring to Ubuntu versions using their code name.
Ok, the trend is to use container, and whatever. Snaps look like that to me. Replacing the Debian packaging with these snap scares me. If I need containers, I think I would use docker — in fact I’ve installed it already. Normally, I don’t need snaps and all the new things needed to make them work.
It’s just crap. Moreover it is Canonical behaving like Microsoff, pushing a “new” technology which they made when other solutions already existed.
It is even worse than the introduction of that crappy thing which luckly died away; how did they call it? I think it was upstart. It had been talked about as if it were a great thing. It wasn’t.
Not that I am the “if it works, keep it” kind of guy all the time. But there are stupid attempts at innovation — innovation is the word used to say that there’s a change and to present that change as a good thing, when indeed nobody has really considered if it is good for the average of the users.
If then changes create new problems which need to be solved by experienced people, who are few because the “innovation” is new too, … well. Very few people — i.e., no one — need to have always the last version, the last software, the last innovation.
I think snaps’ destiny is to fail, but it will be harder to go back for adopters, and so that failure will survive longer than it could be.
My suggestion is to drop snaps: do not use them, hence do not use Ubuntu anymore until it will be back on its track.
Let me say it again:
Do not use Ubuntu anymore until they “park” snaps
About me… It is always hard to reinstall everything, to start over with a new distro — not all distro have all the packages, few programs could be missing… After years of “tuning”, it will be very upsetting. I fear the moment when it will be necessary: for now, I will continue to use Ubuntu 19.10 as I have it on my machine.
When I was about to upgrade I had also a list of package the upgrade would have removed. Among these now I remember only coccinelle.
Why they removed it?
Maybe I don’t need Coccinelle in particular, but there where hundreds of packages to be removed. Not supported anymore? Why? I don’t want to go and check what an upgrade will uninstall without a reason, and wonder why they decided to remove the package. If I have it on my system, I want it on my system also after upgrade. Linking problems with new library, nobody cared to recompile something successfully with the library versions? Make a static package with old library version, maybe — no, do not think about snaps to solve this.
Suggestion to abandon Ubuntu towards… Debian again? I installed Ubuntu in this new laptop of mine hoping for a better hardware support, in particular for the graphics card… but I could just hope in the latest nvidia driver, and that’s all — also considering that for most of the time I don’t use the nvidia card — also, last time I messed with prime, bublebee, and whatever, and now I can’t even remember if I can switch to the nvidia card successfully…
Another anti-snaps detail
Those shitty idiotic snaps are polluting the mount points, so that when I do
mount, I get a list longer than it should be, in my case, even if I hadn’t upgraded, 26 snaps
26 snaps were pushed in my throat without even being notified. There are gnome components,
gtk-common, and few more thing, e.g. “core” which appears four times.
/var/lib/snapd/snaps/core18_1754.snap on /snap/core18/1754 ... /var/lib/snapd/snaps/core_9066.snap on /snap/core/9066 ... /var/lib/snapd/snaps/core_8935.snap on /snap/core/8935 ... /var/lib/snapd/snaps/core18_1705.snap on /snap/core18/1705 ...
And those are polluting my
mount result. And they are using
/dev/loopN more than usual. And they appear also when I do
df -h, so that I need to filter them out. This is more than simply annoying… I feel like I need to metaphorically head-bang the Canonical guys responsible for this.
Please, please, don’t tell me you like this. It also looks very microsofterish to me, again. They are ruining things, and to push a technology which already existed — thinking of flatpak, AppImage, and alike.
Snaps, go to heck.
Post a Comment